We need closure from the team on the facts before we decide on pay and who to hire. If the details are true this will change how we decide on pay and hiring.
I propose that the team give us a written formal explanation on these facts. Tweeting that it is bad journalism is not a good response.
We need confirmation on the bitdao deal, who got the money from joe’s dona sale and why did he do this while working for sushi, what was the process on removing maki and who agreed on it.
We need confidence in the team or we will fail again. If any team member acted bad they need to be removed and a new person hired for the role.
We the sushi community demand a written formal explanation on
The BitDAO Deal
Reference: there are 5 transactions of $500k us dollars worth of bitdao given to 5 wallets Ethereum Transaction Hash (Txhash) Details | Etherscan
Why was payment given to sushi members?
Who received these payments and what did they do with them?
Why was payment given directly to 5 members and not the whole team?
Why was this not diclosed?
**If any team member is using Sushi to make money without disclosing to the community and their team they should be fired for conflict of interest and bad fiduciary duty. No company allows this. We do not too. No punishment means they will do it again. **
I do not believe we can not replace any position in Sushi.
Did any team member do any other secret deals for payment using the Sushi brand?
The DONA Token Sale
Who conducted this token sale?
Who took the money from this sale?
Why did it use the Sushi name?
What was the process for firing 0xmaki?
Who proposed it?
Who voted on it?
Why was this not proposed to the community?
How are teams within sushi managed?
Are there any cliques or relationships that need to be disclosed for conflict of interest?
We need the team to answer these questions for the community. The community faith in the Sushi team is low. Discussing pay and team structure does not fix this without addressing issues and changing problematic team members.